On 18.07.01 at 14:23, Diman Grozny <evil1@hotbox.ru> wrote: >Just a thought: It seems that a site with a "bad hostname" has no chance >of getting validated, and that seems a bit unfair.. the guy who created >the site would really prefer to stick with the "bad" hostname. Wouldn't it >be nice to somehow avoid checking the very URL being validated, or get a >warning instead of getting rejected altogether? The error message comes from our underlying HTTP library; changing it is unlikely to occur. Sorry. Many libraries will reject that host name -- including, probably, some used by browsers -- so it's in his own best interest to change it. (and probably to switch to a service provider that is cluefull enough to alert him to the problem before setting up the site!)Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 14:35:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:22 UTC