- From: Brian Gilkison <gilkison@one.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:35:46 -0500
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Nick Kew wrote: >Isn't there something at <URL:http://www.arealvalidator.com/> ? > >I've recently recompiled Code Valet for Windoze. This is basically >a web-enabled version of SP, to do validation and (many) other things >without the need for an intervening CGI wrapper. It uses Liam's >mods to SP as its starting point. I can report that it compiles cleanly >under cygwin ( <URL:http://cygwin.sourceforge.net/> ), and would infer >that lq-sp will almost certainly do likewise . Well, no offense to Liam (I probably use the WDG validator as much as the W3C when I'm not at home), but 'A Real Validator' has two flaws for my purposes: 1) It costs $$ 2) My ISP allows, among other things, use of SSI and PHP; dropping files onto A Real Validator can't tell me if they're valid, if they've not yet been processed by the server. Since I already have an Apache server with Perl 5.6, and PHP 4.01, at home for staging my ISP files, I'm happy with any Perl or PHP solutions (anyone like to take a crack at a PHP validator? ;) ) My request for a binary was not for the entire validator, but rather for a WIN32 binary of lq-nsgmls to replace James Clark's nsgmls.exe for Windows, since that appears to be the route the W3C Validator will be taking. I've not coded one line of C or C++ in my life, and I don't have a compiler readily available either -- hence the request. Since Cygwin was mentioned, can you recommend a minimum configuration (tools, compiler, etc.) I'd need to get a binary out of Liam's code?
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2001 16:36:23 UTC