- From: ClintonGallagher <csgallagher@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:22:27 -0500
- To: "Bertilo Wennergren" <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Probably the same reason you can put a napkin on your lap when you eat and still find food dripped all over yourself. <%= Clinton Gallagher <!-- -----Original Message----- <!-- From: www-validator-request@w3.org <!-- [mailto:www-validator-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Bertilo Wennergren <!-- Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 4:13 PM <!-- To: www-validator@w3.org <!-- Subject: XHTML validation <!-- <!-- <!-- I ask again, and I'll keep on asking, until someone gives some <!-- resemblance of an answer: <!-- <!-- Why does the w3 validator not validate XHTML? <!-- <!-- XHTML 1.0 is the current HTML standard. Shouldn't the <!-- W3C validator take care of XHTML validation? <!-- <!-- Why does the W3C validator say that non XHTML docs <!-- are valid XHTML 1.0? <!-- <!-- This page at the following URL is not XHTML: <!-- <!-- <http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/mad.html> <!-- <!-- Nevertheless, W3C says: <!-- <!-- "Congratulations, this document validates as XHTML 1.0 Strict!" <!-- <!-- The validator actually only checks for XML well-formedness. <!-- That is not validation. <!-- <!-- If no answer can be given here, where should I ask? <!-- <!-- Does anyone care? What is this list for? <!-- <!-- ##################################################################### <!-- Bertilo Wennergren <!-- <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo> <!-- <bertilow@hem.passagen.se> <!-- ##################################################################### <!-- <!-- <!--
Received on Monday, 12 June 2000 21:28:48 UTC