- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:57:25 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Christian Smith:
> Bertilo was just expressing a common aggravation which many people wanting
> to use the W3C validator are running into. Currently the W3C validator can
> not handle XHTML. This is fairly obvious given the output from just about
> any input. All it currently provides is a well-formedness check which is
> (in all honesty) just about completely useless.
Actually it's worse. As things are now - no warning that the validator
does not handle the current norm for HTML - a blatant lie about validness -
claims on other pages that XHTML is being handled - makes the validator
dangerous. People are probably right now - in good faith - putting XHTML
pages on line which are full or mistakes, but which still carry the W3C
validator's "Valid XHTML!" icon.
Actually there is _no working XHTML validator out there now_. All that
I have tried are seriously broken, and the one at W3C is by far the worst.
When did XHTML 1.0 become a W3C recommendation? In January, right?
It's June now.
> Work needs to be done on the W3C validator if it is ever going to be able
> to validate XHTML. Read this message from Gerald Oskoboiny that addresses
> this issue to some extent:
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2000JanMar/0166.html>
That discussion does not really adrress the current issue. It only talks
about a few special cases where errors might slip through.
> That all said, if you want to validate your XHTML files right now, try the
> HTMLHelp validator at
> <http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/>
You could try it all right, but it's broken. Try it on this test page:
<http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/testform.htm>
Tidy is broken too...
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 01:53:38 UTC