- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 07:57:25 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Christian Smith: > Bertilo was just expressing a common aggravation which many people wanting > to use the W3C validator are running into. Currently the W3C validator can > not handle XHTML. This is fairly obvious given the output from just about > any input. All it currently provides is a well-formedness check which is > (in all honesty) just about completely useless. Actually it's worse. As things are now - no warning that the validator does not handle the current norm for HTML - a blatant lie about validness - claims on other pages that XHTML is being handled - makes the validator dangerous. People are probably right now - in good faith - putting XHTML pages on line which are full or mistakes, but which still carry the W3C validator's "Valid XHTML!" icon. Actually there is _no working XHTML validator out there now_. All that I have tried are seriously broken, and the one at W3C is by far the worst. When did XHTML 1.0 become a W3C recommendation? In January, right? It's June now. > Work needs to be done on the W3C validator if it is ever going to be able > to validate XHTML. Read this message from Gerald Oskoboiny that addresses > this issue to some extent: > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2000JanMar/0166.html> That discussion does not really adrress the current issue. It only talks about a few special cases where errors might slip through. > That all said, if you want to validate your XHTML files right now, try the > HTMLHelp validator at > <http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/> You could try it all right, but it's broken. Try it on this test page: <http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/testform.htm> Tidy is broken too... ##################################################################### Bertilo Wennergren <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo> <bertilow@hem.passagen.se> #####################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 01:53:38 UTC