- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:50:26 +0300
- To: www-validator-css@w3.org
What is the rationale for issuing the warning "Same colors for color and
background-color in two contexts"? It seems that the warning is always
issued, with default settings, when one rule assigns the same value to
background-color as one rule assigns to color, e.g.
a { color: black; }
b { background: black; }
I tried to find an answer in the list archives but found nothing. No
argument whatsoever; what came closest is this:
"The validator is issuing warnings for a situation that, in a general
case, would not be desirable. If you are sure it is OK, just ignore
the warnings."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator-css/2007Feb/0006.html
But that doesn't say at all _why_ it would be undesirable. How is anyone
supposed to be sure that it is OK if he has no idea why the warning has
been given?
Past discussions have often coupled this with the warning about setting
color but not background-color or vice versa (not issued by default,
only when you ask for "All warnings"). And that's a complicated issue,
with some known rationales, but it's a completely different issue.
So why is it regarded as potentially risky, even so that a warning is
issued by default, to use the same color as content color in one element
and as background color in another? Does any W3C recommendation suggest
that there is something at stake here?
--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 19:50:56 UTC