W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors

From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:29:28 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikHNkiBGhN3eXn9iZZ44AAaDc_Bwged6aer7Dzb@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-validator-css@w3.org

> Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific
> extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic
> correctness”, mean a viable alternative?

CSS validator team, anyone?

-- 
Jens O. Meiert
http://meiert.com/en/

Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 05:30:16 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Chris: ""speech" Media Type Not Recognized"
Previous message: Qin Zhong: "Ambiguous sentence in validator output"
In reply to: olivier Thereaux: "Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors"
Next in thread: Jens O. Meiert: "Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors"
Reply: Jens O. Meiert: "Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:01:08 UTC