Re: Vendor-specific extensions: warnings, not errors

On 2010-06-28, at 12:04 AM, Jens O. Meiert wrote:
> Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific
> extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic
> correctness”, mean a viable alternative? From my perspective it does,
> and means a win for everyone involved.

Given how, lately at least, vendor-prefixed extensions seem to be used mostly as a cross-compatibility tool and very rarely for proprietary extensions, this looks like a good idea indeed.

-- 
olivier

Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 12:10:14 UTC