- From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:19:48 -0700
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
A quick follow-up, > > Of course, the validator could just accept any property starting with a dash as "OK", > > but then people would be complaining that it was blessing -moz-bowder-radius > > and -opacity: o. > > That would solve the maintenance problem on the validator team end > though, right? > > Why wouldn’t a warning, clearly stating that “vendor-specific > extensions got found and have only been checked for syntactic > correctness”, mean a viable alternative? From my perspective it does, > and means a win for everyone involved. would that mean an acceptable compromise to the validator team too? -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 05:20:37 UTC