On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:55 PM, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: > So you are suggesting a new text output, rather than modifying the existing > text output? I guess that's feasible. Great. :) I was also thinking that a JSON output format would be useful for many: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/manual.html#requestformat > Is the output format you are suggesting compatible or equivalent to the GNU > error output format? It seems like it would mostly need the addition of the > document file name or URL at the beginning of each line. http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Validator.nu_GNU_Output Yes, I've previously omitted the file as I have not figured out how I can send multiple files with cURL yet. Does the validator support that? Also I think the files "leading directory components" get removed on a post which VIM doesn't like. Though if "multiple file post/upload" does work, having even the file's basename would be super useful for associating validator output with the right file. :) Kind regards,Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 08:22:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:01:02 UTC