Re: URL: Nov 18 deadline for IETF internet drafts

	...
   >From what I see what has been discussed on this list,
   this can be two things:
   1) Concrete proposal(s) on how to do tv-related URIs (updates
   or submissions of already existing ones) One is better 
   than 5 here, of course.
	...

The good news is that we are making progress.

The bad news is that, based on the requirements that have been stated
to this list (and loosely agreed to), I have not seen any proposals
that meet those requirements.  (Important caveat: I do not claim to
have seen all proposals, although I have been looking.)

I am developing one that I believe does meet the requirements.

In an ideal world with infinite time (for this job), I would prefer to
review the proposal within DASE (we're meeting next Thu/Fri Nov
12/13), and then -- if it seems reasonable in that context -- to go
further.

Since we don't have infinite time, I'm willing to short circuit the
process if people here think that doing so is reasonable.

   What we need now are authors for each of the document.
   Who wants to sign up ?

I will.

   Basically, i'd like to replace the list of people listed
   on the group page under the "Document on 'tv' URL scheme"
   on the IG's homepage
   http://www.w3.org/TV/TVWeb/
   by a list of authors actually working on each document.

Craig

Received on Thursday, 5 November 1998 10:45:29 UTC