- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:23:20 +0200
- To: "Eran Hammer-Lahav" <eran@hueniverse.com>
- Cc: "www-talk@w3.org" <www-talk@w3.org>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
2008/10/16 Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>: > In an effort to continue the community's fragmented and repetitive conversation on this topic, I've attempted to collect all the different solutions raised to this problem in a post titled "Discovery and HTTP" [1]. I would be happy to hear new proposals not previously considered, and am happy to explain why I have ruled out some of these suggestions in my analysis. Great survey! The issue of resource description vs. resource representation is one that's cropped up quite a lot around RDF, though offhand I can't think where to find relevant material, except URIQA [1] (from about 2004) which is a set of custom HTTP methods. There's also tangentially related material at WebDescriptionProposals [2] (WADL, WIDL, WRDL...). Cheers, Danny. [1] http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/WebDescriptionProposals -- http://dannyayers.com ~ http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/
Received on Friday, 17 October 2008 10:29:50 UTC