- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:37:51 -0800
- To: <etk31073@stud.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Cc: <www-talk@w3.org>
On Nov 13, 2003, at 6:53 AM, Michael Wedel wrote: > The second solution would be always to return a 200 OK with the > complete enitity in response to If-Modified-Since requests (304 is > only a SHOULD requirement). The problem is that I have always to > answer If-Unmodified-Since requests with 412 (performing the operation > is only a SHOULD requirement), because I cannot determine if they have > been modified or not. This is the right way to do it. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 17 November 2003 22:38:33 UTC