RE: Extended URL for [I]Frames (revived)

are there any documents to which people can point me explaining _why_ 
(i)frames are being removed altogether (or if anyone can just tell me then 
that woudl be fine as well)?

>From: Dave  J Woolley <>
>Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 11:05:35 +0100
> > From:	Mjumbe Ukweli []
> >
> > within URIs (or has there), not just for frames, but iframes, and 
> > objects?
> >
>	[DJW:]  frames and iframes have *never* been in the strict
>	standards and are being taken out completely.  You might want
>	to look at Xlink, but I don't think it goes far enough to allow
>	capturing the state of dynamic content.
>	[ Cross post as original - www-talk will be delayed for
>	  moderation. ]
>--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
>Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
>except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

                                                  &#8226; mjumbe &#8226;

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 09:09:48 UTC