- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:16:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, www-talk@w3.org
Fair enough! I won't take up more of your time with a rant. BTW: just for anyone who is out there. Rajneesh Kumar Thunga has an excellent idea for a HumanML. He should get this accepted by the OASIS org if he can get some others to say it would be valuable. I don't belong to these orgs so I'm no help, but I can certainly see how XML languages such as SVG, X3D, SMIL, RDF, etc. might be able to work with a HumanML. Being able to scope a culturally bound communication in terms of assertions about emotional states would be ... useful and great fun particularly for avatar makers. Emotions are critical for effective negotiations. As I stare into the semantic web, agents, etc., I can certainly see where HumanML could be very valuable to that framework. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2001 23:10:57 UTC