- From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@kestral.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 20:37:29 +1100
- To: www-talk@w3c.org
Hi all John wrote >For something like that the universal browser isn't up to the job, >it sounds like either ship the user a modified browser or do it in >a plugin/applet. (btw, thanks for digging out that thread) But if you're going to do that, why muck around with html/http in the first place? might as well just write a real application in the first place. Then you don't have to deal with brain-dead user input problems, POST problems, printing problems, etc. >This is because they don't realise that >users are already too sophisticated to be controlled. Which users are these? your user population is rather different to mine ;-) Dan wrote, >OK... thanks. Now I understand your motivation. >>From a purely architectural/technical point of view, I agree >with others here who have suggested that your >issue is with the user agent, not with the HTTP >protocol. But I infer that your system engineering >constraints prescribe particular user agents. Sigh... You got it. But the HTTP spec could've helped out a little more than it does. (not that I'd be caught criticising a world beater spec like http) >Actually, I find quite explicit protocol support in HTTP 1.1 for this >case: > >"private > Indicates that all or part of the response message is intended for a single user > and MUST NOT be cached by a shared cache. This allows an origin server to > state that the specified parts of the > response are intended for only one user and are not a valid response for > requests by other users. A private (non-shared) cache MAY cache the response. > > Note: This usage of the word private only controls where the response may be > cached, and cannot ensure the privacy of the message content. " > >-- http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9.1 Oh wow. No I do feel dumb. I'll take my bat and ball and retreat to the corner. (and figure out how to force v1.1 for some pages only) Grahame
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2000 04:47:08 UTC