- From: George Phillips <phillips@opentext.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: David Trout <dtrout@sprintmail.com>
- CC: "Siegel, David" <David.Siegel@dialogic.com>, "'www-talk@w3.org'" <www-talk@w3.org>
David Trout wrote: > You might also consider checking only the first digit for a "4" or a "5" > instead of "404" specifically, since there are other errors besides 'Not > Found' that indicates a given document in inaccessable. (The list of > possible response codes and what they mean are documented in section 10.) Having been down this road, I think "inaccessable" needs emphasis. Many other 400 series error codes don't deny the existence of the URL just that you haven't the proper access credentials. A browser may well be able to access the URL because either (a) the user knows the password or (b) the browser knows the password (NTLM authentication). Of course, the browser may know about many other important bits such as proxies. And don't bother using "HEAD" -- you'll get the wrong answer too many times. Just use GET. -- George
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2000 12:39:41 UTC