- From: Steven Clift <clift@freenet.msp.mn.us>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 13:21:37 +0000
- To: online-news@planetarynews.com, ietf@ietf.org, www-talk@w3.org, webcasting@broadcast.net, COMMUNET@LIST.UVM.EDU
Boy, the list of patents that people are getting these days seem to
be way too obvious to be thought of as property. At a very basic
level it seems to me that someone is about to essentially receive a
patent for at it case level a set of e-mail distribution lists that
are designed with some structure - now that is original.
What does the Internet Society, the IETF, the W3C and others do in
reaction to these patents that seem so far out?
How does one formally submit comments into this process? Can the
White House issue some sort of executive order to bring some light
into what is happening or create special rules for patents related to
the -basic- functions of the Internet?
Following up from my post on metadata and after reading a few
articles on digital television it struck me that a well designed
meta-data system could allow people to preset the broadcast pushed
bytes that people would want their set-top boxes/"TV" to store for
later use - this patent would make that concept something you would
have to license - come on. From a electronic free speech or
electronic free assembly perspective these patent contraints will
only dampen the democractic potential of the Internet.
Steven Clift
Democracies Online
Good Morning Silicon Valley alerted me to this:
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,14970,00.html
Push patents
raise issues for
industry
By Alex Lash
October 6, 1997, 6:45 p.m. PT
Push technology company
Intermind is about to
receive a patent it hopes
will force Microsoft
(MSFT), Netscape (NSCP),
and other push players to
pay royalties, its president
told CNET's NEWS.COM
today.
- clip -
The patent covers any
situation "when a publisher
and subscriber exchange a
control structure or
metadata that automates
consistent delivery of
information," Intermind
cofounder Drummond Reed
said. "You don't just get a
new flow of info; you get a
whole variety of ways to
control that flow."
Reed's description of the
patented technology sounds
like the function of the
Channel Definition Format
(CDF) file that Internet
Explorer 4.0 supports or
the mechanism Netscape's
Netcaster uses to update
channels. Reed and
Gardiner are counting on
that similarity to create a
new revenue stream for
their struggling company.
- clipped -
-------------------------------------------------------
Steven L. Clift, Director, Democracies Online
3454 Fremont Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55408 USA
Tel: 612-824-3747 E: clift@freenet.msp.mn.us
http://www.e-democracy.org/do/ - Democracies Online
http://freenet.msp.mn.us/people/clift/ - Home Page
-------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 1997 14:25:40 UTC