- From: Steven Clift <clift@freenet.msp.mn.us>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 13:21:37 +0000
- To: online-news@planetarynews.com, ietf@ietf.org, www-talk@w3.org, webcasting@broadcast.net, COMMUNET@LIST.UVM.EDU
Boy, the list of patents that people are getting these days seem to be way too obvious to be thought of as property. At a very basic level it seems to me that someone is about to essentially receive a patent for at it case level a set of e-mail distribution lists that are designed with some structure - now that is original. What does the Internet Society, the IETF, the W3C and others do in reaction to these patents that seem so far out? How does one formally submit comments into this process? Can the White House issue some sort of executive order to bring some light into what is happening or create special rules for patents related to the -basic- functions of the Internet? Following up from my post on metadata and after reading a few articles on digital television it struck me that a well designed meta-data system could allow people to preset the broadcast pushed bytes that people would want their set-top boxes/"TV" to store for later use - this patent would make that concept something you would have to license - come on. From a electronic free speech or electronic free assembly perspective these patent contraints will only dampen the democractic potential of the Internet. Steven Clift Democracies Online Good Morning Silicon Valley alerted me to this: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,14970,00.html Push patents raise issues for industry By Alex Lash October 6, 1997, 6:45 p.m. PT Push technology company Intermind is about to receive a patent it hopes will force Microsoft (MSFT), Netscape (NSCP), and other push players to pay royalties, its president told CNET's NEWS.COM today. - clip - The patent covers any situation "when a publisher and subscriber exchange a control structure or metadata that automates consistent delivery of information," Intermind cofounder Drummond Reed said. "You don't just get a new flow of info; you get a whole variety of ways to control that flow." Reed's description of the patented technology sounds like the function of the Channel Definition Format (CDF) file that Internet Explorer 4.0 supports or the mechanism Netscape's Netcaster uses to update channels. Reed and Gardiner are counting on that similarity to create a new revenue stream for their struggling company. - clipped - ------------------------------------------------------- Steven L. Clift, Director, Democracies Online 3454 Fremont Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55408 USA Tel: 612-824-3747 E: clift@freenet.msp.mn.us http://www.e-democracy.org/do/ - Democracies Online http://freenet.msp.mn.us/people/clift/ - Home Page -------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 1997 14:25:40 UTC