- From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 09:32:11 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: clintdw@netcom.com (Clinton Wong)
- Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Clinton Wong: > > >In future versions of HTTP, would it be a nice feature to have >a version number as a parameter to the content-type and accept >header in HTTP? Let me explain... > >To specify that a document is HTML 3.2 compliant, one might >want to upgrade HTTP to include things like: > >Content-type: text/html (v3.2) > >or to specify components of HTML, how about extra parameters to >specify what capabilities are expected of the client? For example, >if frames are used, the header might look like: > >Content-type: text/html (v3.2/frames) [...] The HTTP-wg is already working on a system to do this type of thing: it is called feature negotiation. Read some sections in http://gewis.win.tue.nl/~koen/conneg/draft-ietf-http-negotiation-01.html for an introduction. Some parts of this draft are still subject to change. In fact, there will probably be a new version this week. [...] > - One can keep statistics about the capabilities of > web browsers and servers. It might be possible to > say things like "84% of our hits are from browsers > that understand Cascading Style Sheets." You can do this even now, using the User-Agent request header. You will need some database to map agent names and versions to feature sets, though. >Regards, >Clinton Koen.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 1997 03:32:34 UTC