- From: Andrew Daviel <andrew@andrew.triumf.ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 17:02:23 -0800 (PST)
- To: didier ph martin <dmartin@cedep.com>
- Cc: W3 org <www-talk@w3.org>
On Wed, 19 Mar 1997, didier ph martin wrote: > typing for Meta Content (also called profiles). We came with a new spec > which is located at http://www.netfolder.com/SDK/index.htm. Re. MCF embedded into a HTML file, since DC is settling on <meta name="DC.creator" content="Conan Doyle"> (with some wrangling about where to put SCHEME) and we already have well-established <meta name="description" content="detective stories"> I thought perhaps one might use e.g. <meta name="MCF.authorIndividual" content="Conan Doyle"> In the comment version (waiting on new tags), it's hard to see how to parse the MCF distinct from random comments, JavaScript, etc. In the mail-header version there's nothing to identify the X-info as MCF, to distinguish it from all the other stuff like X-Mailer, X-Comment, X-Face, X-Report-Type etc. that turns up in my mailbox. How about X-MCF.TocOf etc. ? Re. http transport; correspondance I have had from Roy Fielding suggests that one shouldn't invent arbitrary random HTTP headers; the "X-" convention is undefined in RFC 2068. Meanwhile, some DC people say they're going to move to PICS or XML in a year or two, and I thought I was confused enough already ... :-} Andrew Daviel TRIUMF/Vancouver Webpages
Received on Thursday, 20 March 1997 20:02:25 UTC