- From: sameer <sameer@c2.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 13:39:16 -0800 (PST)
- To: abigail@ny.fnx.com
- Cc: brian@organic.com, hedlund@best.com, dmk@research.bell-labs.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-talk@www10.w3.org
> I think the problem is more fundamental. If we force HTTP/1.0 clients > to accept HTTP/1.1 reponses, they also have to accept HTTP/1.2, > HTTP/1.7, etc responses. That of course means no HTTP/1.x header can > ever contain something which causes problems with HTTP/1.0 clients. That's correct. That *is* why it's called HTTP/1.x, and not HTTP/2.x -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 President FAX: 510-986-8777 C2Net C2Net is having a party: http://www.c2.net/party/ http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net
Received on Monday, 30 December 1996 16:18:46 UTC