- From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 12:06:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- cc: www-talk@w3.org
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.961217112124.12367C-100000@ns.viet.net>, > Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com> wrote: > > Ah, no you missed what I meant. You could end up loading 40K of <LINK>s in > > the head before you loaded 4 or 5K of actual <BODY>. You should have a > > link to another URL *which contains* the full list. > > <LINK REL=backlinks HREF="wherever/" TITLE="My backlinks!"> Exactly. That is what I am saying you *should* do. The way the person I was responding to seemed to be suggesting this instead: <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever/" TITLE="backlink1"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever1/" TITLE="backlink1"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever2/" TITLE="backlink2"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever3/" TITLE="backlink3"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever4/" TITLE="backlink4"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever5/" TITLE="backlink5"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever6/" TITLE="backlink6"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever7/" TITLE="backlink7"> <LINK REL=backlink HREF="wherever8/" TITLE="backlink8"> Which gets nasty fast. I have pages with well over a hundred backlinks. > Or is this too simple? Nope. -- Benjamin Franz
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 1996 15:06:31 UTC