- From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:24:54 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-talk@w3.org
On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Alejandro Rivero wrote: > > > After my experience with the script to capture REFERRER information > > > (WWW pages pointing to pages on my server), I took a bit more > > > of time to be able both to capture and serve such "backlinks" > > > within each html page. It could be a good reason > > > for browser to implement finally the LINK tag. > > > > Perhaps. But my experience (I've been recording and analyzing REFERRER for > > about a year and a half now) indicates that even a moderately popular page > > could be swamped with the number of backlinks - it really should have at > > least one level of indirection -> pointing to another URL with the list > > of backlinks. > > > > Well, that is exactly the point. LINK information goes to the HEAD part, > so HTML text is not swamped anymore. Of course, maintenance is needed > to avoid obsolete links increasing such HEAD. Ah, no you missed what I meant. You could end up loading 40K of <LINK>s in the head before you loaded 4 or 5K of actual <BODY>. You should have a link to another URL *which contains* the full list. -- Benjamin Franz
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 1996 14:25:10 UTC