- From: Rens Troost <rens@name.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 12:20:13 -0500
- To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com (Larry Masinter), kdyer@draper.com, www-talk@w3.org, koen@win.tue.nl, rens@century.com, sdorner@qualcomm.com
> > You can develop a complex interrelation - when does Content-Type take > precedence, when does Content-Disposition? Appended is what I do. In brief; trust C-D for storage names,trust C-T for viewer selection. Im not sure this kind of thing is appropriate to promulgate in an RFC, though. ANy thoughts? to generate a filename: if C-D provided use suggested name else if C-T has associated suffix generate name with appropriate suffix else dont suggest a name endif endif to launch a viewer: if c-t has registered viewer launch appropriate viewer else prompt user endif -Rens
Received on Sunday, 10 November 1996 12:25:20 UTC