W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > January to February 1996

Re: Microsoft IE -- it just gets better and better

From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 11:12:24 -0600
Message-Id: <199601291712.LAA28297@hopf.math.nwu.edu>
To: www-talk@w3.org

In article <>, Bill Weinman 
>    The Accept string, or perhaps a new tag of some sort, would 
> give a list of features that the client can render. (It seems 
> inappropriate to define lots of new MIME-types for this.) 
>    Then the content could be coded with conditionals that would 
> give either low-level or feature-rich content on an object-by-object 
> basis. 
>    That way I wouldn't have to have entirely different source 
> for all the different combinations of support implemented by 
> all the different browsers. 

Several servers already offer conditional constructs on the server
side.  (See for example, http://hopf.math.nwu.edu/docs/parse.html#if )
This is easy to use and gives great flexibility to the site maintainer.
It allows different versions based on browser features, accept
headers, remote host or domain, etc. There is some overhead in parsing
the document as it is served, but generally this is fairly efficient.

It has the drawback (shared by all current content negotiation methods)
of not interacting well with caching.  

One suggestion has been a conditional HTML which is parsed and interpreted
by the client.  This seems to be a very good idea.  It completely solves
the caching problem.  One drawback is that documents might become
substantially larger if they contain all virtual versions.

I am not very optimistic about its adoption, however.  The SGML heritage
of HTML is likely to be a stumbling block and the political problem
of getting browser writers to accept such a scheme may well be insurmountable.


John Franks 	Dept of Math. Northwestern University
Received on Monday, 29 January 1996 12:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:19 UTC