- From: Alan Wexelblat <wex@media.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 95 23:14:46 -0400
- To: francis@cactus.slab.ntt.jp
- Cc: rating@junction.net, uri@bunyip.com, www-talk@www10.w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Forgive me, but I'm unclear on what the problem is. I'm also not sure I can help you. Paul Francis wrote: > an automatic-grading system through correlation of peoples' opinions like > you have built could just as easily be used to filter out unwanted > resources as to "filter in" wanted resources. It seems you've got a lot of erroneous assumptions; I suggest you try the system for yourself and form an opinion. But maybe I'm just confused. You seem to think: - we're imposing rating; we're not, the ratings come from the users - we're actively including material (URLs in Webhound's case); we're not, the database of URLs is user-grown (thus we only have around 10,000 URLs in the database; Webcrawler claims to have over 3 million URLs) - I am responsible for Webhound; I'm not. Webhound is the product of thesis research by one of our graduating masters students, Yedzi Lashkari (yezdi@media.mit.edu). He is building on the work of two previous masters students as well as the group director, Dr Pattie Maes. (Though, if I may say so, I think Yezdi has derived some interesting new results which I expect will be published in a year or so.) Webhound is being featured in GNN's publications and web pages RSN. See those sources for more info if you like. Finally, I'm still not sure what you're concerned about. Are you bothered that Webhound may not recommend to people documents they don't want to see but by some measure you think they should know about? Yours in confusion... - --Alan Wexelblat, Reality Hacker, Author, and Cyberspace Bard MIT Media Lab - Intelligent Agents Group finger(1) for PGP key Voice: 617-253-9833 Pager: 617-945-1842 wex@media.mit.edu http://wex.www.media.mit.edu/people/wex/ "When the possibity of art forms is analyzed from a rationalist standpoint, most can be shown to be dubious at best, if not outright impossible." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUBL+oxehy0XEvHKpe1AQGwLwQAoDQePBZ3lry07hta+T1QvfeHSdZm8ZVB vpTefQW6tXTp7d+kbF92s8J2UG9Jib6+JYXMCAni1O1YXOZMzgNVnjhjsUbQyHt0 4FODNa3cyoKiMMp/YTWFchMkPoyn+jvyufpW6JfCgaOEXedG1W4mbomNkB4nMe5d wQpiEjk4gyg= =I0Mn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 22 June 1995 23:15:14 UTC