W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > May to June 1995

Re: caching dilemma

From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@utopia.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 05:22:12 -0400
Message-Id: <v02120d0aabf1dbc4add5@[204.57.39.3]>
To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
Cc: www-talk@www10.w3.org
At 10:51 PM 5/30/95, Koen Holtman wrote:
>I've been writing on a draft spec commentary which suggests that the
>expires header may be used to allow control cacheability of 302 (and
>300) responses.

I wonder if we should move away from the expires vs. cache issue and just
explicitly disabling the cache. Netscape does this already with a pragma
directive - with dynamic documents (say an order form where you don't want
the history to point at an old version) I use both that expires and the
nocache directive just to be sure.

Kee Hinckley      Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects    617/721-6100
nazgul@utopia.com                               http://www.utopia.com/

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 1995 05:22:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:17 UTC