- From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@utopia.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 05:22:12 -0400
- To: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
- Cc: www-talk@www10.w3.org
At 10:51 PM 5/30/95, Koen Holtman wrote: >I've been writing on a draft spec commentary which suggests that the >expires header may be used to allow control cacheability of 302 (and >300) responses. I wonder if we should move away from the expires vs. cache issue and just explicitly disabling the cache. Netscape does this already with a pragma directive - with dynamic documents (say an order form where you don't want the history to point at an old version) I use both that expires and the nocache directive just to be sure. Kee Hinckley Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects 617/721-6100 nazgul@utopia.com http://www.utopia.com/ I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 1995 05:22:46 UTC