- From: <Somers@sisc.ucl.ac.be>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 95 16:30:49 +0200
- To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Cc: Somers@sisc.ucl.ac.be, Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
> Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com> wrote: > > There shouldn't be any context issues. For each request, the "optimal" page > is delivered. The algorithm that determines "optimal" is left open to the > document author/server developer - the HTTP spec simply says that in the > Accept-Language: request fields list languages in the order of preference. > Furthermore, the spec says "If the server cannot fulfill the request with one > or more of the languages given, or if the languages only represent a subset > of a multi-linguistic Entity-Body, it is acceptable to serve the request > in an unspecified language", though I suppose you could also send an > error code 406, "None Acceptible" and offer links to the versions you > support. Which clients allow to configure the Accept-Language Request ? > I posted a week ago here that we needed a mechanism in URL's to express > request headers, so that some sort of addressing can be used to obtain > specific representations of objects (i.e., *exactly* the Italian version > without requiring that the Italian version have its own URL). I didn't > get any response, but I also hear that the mail list redistributor blew > up last week - did anyone respond to that? 1) from a document: ex: The anchor to the Italian version of the document (even the Accept-Language of the client is english, give the italian version ! <a href=URL ???>Italian version</a>) Possibility: An option in the <a href=URL Accept-Language=it>...</a> anchor who bypass the Accept-Language request ??? 2) from the client: - change the accept-language preferrence - or get the document with to above 1) option (who don't exists !) Francis Somers
Received on Monday, 29 May 1995 10:31:22 UTC