- From: Kee Hinckley <nazgul@utopia.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 1995 16:24:27 -0400
- To: martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
At 10:21 AM 5/10/95, Martin Hamilton wrote: >Rick Troth writes: > >| I don't see any way to do "real authentication" without >| using public key electronic signatures, and I question whether or not >| we need something that strong to eliminate news and mail forgery. > >I suspect SMTP and NNTP are still an authentication free zone for the vast >majority of Internet users. > Best shot is to have a browser that can be >configured to refuse to send messages unless _it_ is happy > with your >credentials ? I'm confused. Are you advocating a central registry of all browser owners, where the browser checks that registry, asks me to match the password, and then lets me send mail? I think a public key system would be simpler, safer and more private. Kee Hinckley Utopia Inc. - Cyberspace Architects 617/721-6100 nazgul@utopia.com http://www.utopia.com/ I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
Received on Sunday, 28 May 1995 16:24:55 UTC