W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > May to June 1995

Re: How bout types of colored links?

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 08:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Adam T. McClure" <mcclurea@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9505090812.f24326-0100000@eat.organic.com>
On Tue, 9 May 1995, Adam T. McClure wrote:
> One of the things I ran into in creating a teching tool recently was
> that I couldn't denote a particular thread.  I wanted to target the
> paper for multiple audiences and provide support for less technically-
> inclined audiences without compromising the flow of the paper.  It
> seemed logical to me to define a named type of link that has a particular
> color associated with it.  All the references to definitions could be
> in blue, the links to other elements of the discussion in red, and 
> purple would jump off my server to an off-site page.  All visited
> links could be tan if I felt like it.  There's currently a method in
> Netscape 1.1 to define different colors for visited and new links,
> as well as redefining the standard text color, but there's no way
> to have your own labelled links.  

This feels like a style sheet issue - you have something like

a.class1 = #F00
a.class2 = #0F0

and then

<a href="file1.html" class="class1">This class of link</a>
<a href="file2.html" class="class2">That other class of link</a>

Is this what you want?  Style sheet designers should note the need for 
different colors for visited and not-yet-visited links of course.

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 1995 11:41:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:17 UTC