W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > March to April 1995

Re: Why Mosaic

From: Patrik Berglund <patrik@kajen.malmo.se>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 11:48:01 +0200
To: uid#15033@dxal18.cern.ch
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9404021108.B1175-0100000@beachboy.kajen.malmo.se>
On Mon, 27 Mar 1995 uid#15033@dxal18.cern.ch wrote:

> |>My question is: Why does people use Mosaic when Netscape is better and
> |>can be obtained free all over the net?
> Because many people are unable to run it on their machines (such as me). And 
> others are unable to read Netscapes small text on a dark grey background
> (also me).

Why don't they use a larger font, then? It _can_ be set to different 
fonts and sizes.

> The question you should ask yourself is why do people use Netscape when Arena
> offers far superior layout, including maths and has done for a considerable
> time?

When can we expect to find a usable version of Arena? A version that requires a
zillion parameters on the command line is rather annyoing to use. AND it would be
nice to either have preferences-option inside the program, or a settings-file. (I
didn't say I didn't like Arena - I do. But there are a couple of features I miss
from Netscape)


| Patrik Berglund || patrik@kajen.malmo.se    || Kajplats 305            |
| Malmoe, Sweden  || patrik.berglund@pb.ct.se || N. Neptunigatan 5       |
`-----------------'`--------------------------'| S-211 20 Malmoe, Sweden |
   .--------------------------------------.    `-------------------------'
   |  Finger my address for PGP 2.6ui-key |
Received on Sunday, 2 April 1995 06:47:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 20 January 2020 16:08:16 UTC