Re: test of new Location header usage

Thanks for resonding

On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Joseph R Barge wrote:

> Could someone please take me off of this list. My reason for signing on 
> has since disappeared so I would greatly appreciate instructions to help 
> me, or if someone just did it I would be eternally grateful!! Thank You
> 
> On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
> 
> >  
> > >  Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> > > and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> > > 
> > >  I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
> > 
> > Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
> > and preferably in many cases.
> > 
> > 
> > rob
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 10 August 1995 23:34:14 UTC