Re: test of new Location header usage from Joseph R Barge on 1995-08-10 (www-talk@w3.org from July to August 1995)

From: Joseph R Barge <jrbarge@umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 23:15:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: hartill@lanl.gov
Cc: decoux@moulon.inra.fr, www-talk@w3.org
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950809231346.23508A-100000@joust.rs.itd.umich.edu>

Could someone please take me off of this list. My reason for signing on 
has since disappeared so I would greatly appreciate instructions to help 
me, or if someone just did it I would be eternally grateful!! Thank You

On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:

>  
> >  Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> > and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> > 
> >  I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
> 
> Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
> and preferably in many cases.
> 
> 
> rob
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 9 August 1995 23:19:00 UTC