- From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 10:45:00 -0700
- To: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
- Cc: sjk@amazon.com (Shel Kaphan), www-talk@w3.org
lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk writes: > Shel Kaphan said: > > > > As it turns out, using the NCSA server (v 1.3) there is apparently no > > way for a CGI program to return the Location header with a 2xx status. > > First, that statement is untrue. Secondly, this is a feature not a bug. > Less Filling! Tastes Great! Yes, you can do this with the nph-* thing, of which I was unaware until yesterday. But in what sense is it a feature for things to work this way? You can use the Location directive by itself to issue a redirect. Nothing I suggested would change this. The question is what happens when you want a Location header in the response as well as a 2xx return code. Having to bypass all server-inserted headers by using the nph kluge is a bit unfortunate, that's all. What is so unreasonable about wanting the Status server directive to be obeyed in all cases? > > If you generate a Location header, the server forces 302 status. > > Yes. That is what outputting the string Location: is supposed to do; it > lets you issue a redirect from a program, without the hassle of creating > all your own headers yourself. > Ah, so you agree having to generate all your own headers is a hassle. > > Sounds like a patch is needed. (maybe there are newer versions that > > already have this fixed?) > > No, and no. Suppose this was patched. How would you ever issue a redirect? Same as now: by using the Location directive without an overriding Status directive. BTW, the Netscape server works as I suggest right this very minute. If you use a Location directive but no Status directive, it defaults to 302. Use a Status directive too, and it believes you. How terribly controversial! > You would have to generate all your own headers. Imagemap would stop > working. Etc. > No. > So here is the impossible program. As you can see it is not complicated: > ... I'm suitably impressed. You knew about something I didn't: this incredible nph thing. --Shel
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 1995 13:50:37 UTC