Re: a test result

• From: Shel Kaphan <sjk@amazon.com>
• Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 11:06:45 -0700
• To: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
• Cc: www-talk@w3.org
• Message-Id: <199508091806.LAA28978@bert.amazon.com>

lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk writes:

	...
 > So, you have a location header and a 200 status. The client will of 
 > course do nothing with the Location header, because the status is not 
 > 300 series.
 > 

Of course, the whole point of this discussion is that (assuming the
new version of the spec stands) is that clients *will* eventually do
something with a 2xx status and a Location header: they'll use that
location URI as the cache key for the returned resource, for instance.

--Shel

Received on Wednesday, 9 August 1995 14:22:54 UTC