Re: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text

On 10/10/2014 07:35 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Now let me describe my next steps.
>
> 1) I'm going to attempt to build a faithful implementation of the URL
> Standard.  By that, I mean that it will do the steps as written, with
> little regard for things like performance.  This effort may identify
> problems with the spec.  As a concrete example, I don't see how c could
> be the EOF code point at in scheme data state step 3.1[1].  I'll collect
> these up and report them on the whatwg mailing list, and once the
> discussion dies down, will open bug reports on whatever is remaining.

Progress update: I've posted collected comments to the whatwg mailing list:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014Oct/0142.html

- Sam Ruby

Received on Saturday, 11 October 2014 00:25:03 UTC