Re: Draft [URL] reference update to informative text

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> I'll note that these inputs are not consistent.

If there are changes to the specification that are an improvement and
you would be willing to make them, I don't see why those would not be
accepted. I just don't personally think that's what we need to move
this to the next level.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 10 October 2014 10:00:01 UTC