Re: HTTP/2 in the open, was: Draft Edited F2F Minutes are Up

> On 7 Oct 2014, at 09:07, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2014-10-06 23:57, Daniel Appelquist wrote:
>> ...
> 
> Snip:
> 
>> wycats: http/2 doesn’t mandate SSL right?
>> 
>> mnot: it doesn’t, we decided to move on and not require it
>> 
>> ... but the browsers are saying they’ll only support http/2 for SSL
> 
> That's a bit misleading (maybe incorrectly minuted); Microsoft has stated multiple times that they intend to implement HTTP/2 in the clear.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

Thanks. Yes, this was discussed. I have updated the minutes to clarify.

https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/commit/e7bd792451819c343b300cfcfe6a9bc30d51129d <https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/commit/e7bd792451819c343b300cfcfe6a9bc30d51129d>

Dan