HTTP/2 in the open, was: Draft Edited F2F Minutes are Up

On 2014-10-06 23:57, Daniel Appelquist wrote:
> ...

Snip:

> wycats: http/2 doesn’t mandate SSL right?
>
> mnot: it doesn’t, we decided to move on and not require it
>
> ... but the browsers are saying they’ll only support http/2 for SSL

That's a bit misleading (maybe incorrectly minuted); Microsoft has 
stated multiple times that they intend to implement HTTP/2 in the clear.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 08:07:55 UTC