W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Is the TAG structure harmful? [Was: Fwd: Forced Resignation]

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 06:45:34 -0600
To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20140702064534.8b5395fb90386f200d2fdafc@bisonsystems.net>
"Eric J. Bowman" wrote:

> Further re-hashing the facts wouldn't have served any purpose.
> Pointing out that the WG needed to step off and reconsider
> architectural ramifications proved much more effective, possibly
> because someone not named Roy or Julian reinforced it? Not my desired
> result, but far better than what was proposed.

OMG, did I mention Roy and Julian *twice* without mentioning TBL? Sorry
'bout that, Tim! Certainly didn't mean to omit the king of Web prior
art! Like anyone else here I may disagree vehemently with at times,
nothing but respect. I'm really a nice guy in person, it's my online
persona that's the ***. :-) We've never met, my health problems preclude
any travel commitments, but y'all should have a meeting in Colorado
sometime. It's how I keep up with the NMR world...


Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 12:45:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:57:03 UTC