- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:14:58 -0600
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > > It is true that the TAG doesn't typically vote on more detailed > aspects of its work, e.g. whether a given section of a draft document > should be accepted as 'status quo' or whether some technical > direction seems a good one. Still, at least until recently the TAG > did not "speak as the TAG" without a formal check by the chair that > consensus had been achieved, or failing that, objections noted. I > don't know whether that custom is still being observed. > I don't either. There are myriad reasons for my lack of participation here recently, but corporate capture is at the top of the list, which I never perceived as a problem when that custom you mention was observed. -Eric
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 06:15:21 UTC