RE: TAG Blog Post on Feedback from Extensible Web Summit

• From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
• Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:36:04 +0000
• To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
• CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <c1c4d2cf200d491185de0562d425bd2b@BN1PR05MB325.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>

> Regarding "so, how do we get the W3C to update its `events process` to include gatherings like this?", there were some related discussions: one on a Member list [1] and another on public-w3process [2].

While I do think these are good initiatives, I believe pretty firmly that the Extensible Web Summits should not be W3C events (or WHATWG events, or IETF events, or Google events, or Mozilla events). They are larger than any one organization.

Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 21:36:39 UTC