- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:32:22 -0400
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 4/17/14 2:17 PM, ext Domenic Denicola wrote: > That's good feedback. I think we did a fairly good job communicating through the venues available to us, but what are some venues where you think the communication should have taken place, that we missed? Regarding "so, how do we get the W3C to update its `events process` to include gatherings like this?", there were some related discussions: one on a Member list [1] and another on public-w3process [2]. A new [EventsProcess] wiki was started to gather some input (e.g. Problem Statement, Considerations, Best Practices, Recommendations and such) and a few related bugs were filed [3]. If folks want to discuss how the Consortium can update its arcane "Workshops and Symposia" process [4] to include events like this Summit, I encourage them to participate via public-w3process and/or update [EventsProcess] directly. However, don't hold your breath re something actually happening RSN since some AB members indicated nothing is likely to happen for a "few years" [5]. -Thanks, AB [EventsProcess] <https://www.w3.org/wiki/EventsProcess> [1] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2014JanMar/0142.html> [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Apr/0001.html> [3] <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/products/7> [4] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/events.html#GAEvents> [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Apr/0011.html>
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 21:33:39 UTC