Re: [John C Klensin] [apps-discuss] URNs are not URIs (another look at RFC 3986)

On 15/04/2014 12:36, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> I have just read the draft, and confirmed my impression. Please see
> for some
> initial response.

Coincidentally (or maybe not), I just sent my response, too:

I, too, am not understanding what problems are actually solved by saying URNs 
are not URIs.

> P.S.: Yes, the IETF now uses Archived-At! But the mail archive pages that can be
> reached that way aren't linked at all :-(.

I noticed that too.  I guess it's a useful step.


Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 14:48:17 UTC