Re: draft HTTP 209 draft spec review

On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, ashok malhotra wrote:

> On 4/11/2014 3:21 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> Having a specific code here is mostly for efficient signalling
> I would have said "accurate signalling".  Don't you think that's
> enough motivation?

As long as signalling is unambigous, it is of the accurate kind. Here, 
using a status code is for efficiency, and worth doing only if it goes 
beyond being only 303+200.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras.


Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 13:58:11 UTC