Re: Hanging stuff of navigator

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:  
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com (mailto:w3c@marcosc.com)> wrote:
> > Using an input would certainly be nicer. I guess it's part of a larger discussion. At the moment, we are getting WG's to send their APIs for review to public-script-coord, but maybe we need another group which is more like "public-should-this-really-be-made-declarative-coord@w3.org (mailto:public-should-this-really-be-made-declarative-coord@w3.org)" ^_^ … or www-tag?
>  
>  
>  
> It seems like most things end up being useful as imperative in one way
> or another down the road. E.g. <input type=file> is used that way
> sometimes (via .click()). But that kind of thing should come up during
> API review in general I think. And I'm not sure how fussed we should
> be about whether the API is in the form of <element> or method().
> Either way it needs review as to whether it's the best approach.

Sure… but about the navigator thingy, should I bug the SysApps WG to change their APIs? Or is the idea of making more use of interface objects not worth fighting for?

Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 18:55:32 UTC