Re: AWWW second edition, maybe -- terminology

Larry Masinter writes:

> HTTPbis is in last call. Renaming 'resource' would be a major
> editing task, rewriting text that has been reviewed countless times
> in service of a change that makes no normative difference and is
> based on nothing more than personal preference.

Nowhere in my post did I suggest changing HTTPbis.  I absolutely agree
with you.

As my recent reply to Noah suggests, I'm suggesting we explore not going
'there' at all, where by 'there' I mean using 'resource' _or any other
word_ as if there were some class which constituted the range of the
"what does a URI mean/identify/pick out/refer to" function.

As Jonathan Rees said more succinctly [1]

  "If there is terminology that *cannot* be explained and whose use
   inexorably leads to confusion, then the TAG can help lead the
   community away from confusion simply by being careful to avoid use
   of that terminology."

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Jun/0027.html
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 16:03:17 UTC