- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:59:19 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51B20357.3080509@openlinksw.com>
On 6/7/13 7:48 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Futher to discussion at the recent f2f, and With a lot of help from > Marcos and Yves, we have a staging area on GitHub [1] for a _possible_ > second edition [2] of AWWW [3]. I emphasise that the TAG have _not_ > yet decided to do this, rather we are _considering_ it. I have said > I'll consider trying to edit a new edition _provided_ we can satisfy > ourselves that the scope of the effort can be effectively limited. > > Of the various wedges whose thin edges we can anticipate threatening > to turn into dangerous scope-creep, terminology is definitely high on > the list. > > One example: At the f2f, Tim Berners-Lee mentioned that he would > prefer to drop all use of the word 'resource'. I too would like to do > this, and indeed I recently posted [2] to this list a pointer to a > talk I gave which introduces an approach to the httpRange-14 issue > which avoids the word. > > To try to take this conversation forward, [1][2] contain (with diffs > highlighted) a new Abstract, which removes 'resource', and introduces > the 'active' aspect of the Web, as follows: > > The World Wide Web uses relatively simple technologies with > sufficient scalability, efficiency and utility that they have > resulted in a remarkable interconnected space of information and > services, growing across languages, cultures and media. In an effort > to preserve these properties of the space as the technologies > evolve, this architecture document discusses the core design > components of the Web. They are identification of information and > services, representation of information state and service requests, > and the protocols that support the interaction between agents in the > space. We relate core design components, constraints, and good > practices to the principles and properties they support. > > Does this look like the kind of direction we'd like to move in? +1000 Bury "Resource" it's a confusion vector like no other. It turns the ingenuity inherent in AWWW on its head. > > ht > > [1] https://github.com/w3ctag/webarch > [2] http://w3ctag.github.io/webarch/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013May/0056.html -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 15:59:41 UTC