- From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:46:18 +0000
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- CC: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Dear all, Let me start by thanking the TAG for this review. It is great to see the TAG getting its hands dirty and reviewing several specs in the web platform for consistency and quality. I am very grateful for the work. ROC pointed to the following part of the review, which I also find problematic. On 26/07/2013 02:16, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: >In the discussion of data races, it's not completely clear to me whether >the current situation (as implemented in Webkit/Blink) is considered by >the TAG to be "impermissible visible data races". Can you clarify that? While the issue is obviously controversial in the WG, and the input of the TAG more than welcome, I feel I have to point back at my earlier message on the topic: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JulSep/0245.html Language such as “it is impermissible for Web Audio to unilaterally add visible data races” without any consideration of the probability and impact of said data races is, IMHO, rather peremptory and thus ultimately unhelpful in helping our group decide the best course of action. If the TAG members made this conclusion based on careful analysis of the problem rather than on the general principle that "data races are bad", I suggest a pointer to the analysis would be a worthy addition to the review. Thanks, Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 07:46:56 UTC