Re: HTTP 2.0: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04

On 7/15/13 12:22 PM, Appelquist Daniel (UK) wrote:
> Hy Yves - FYI I created an issue in github to track feedback on the http
> spec and I took the liberty of assigning it to you.  I'm not sure if we
> have any meaningful feedback to share, but if we do I'm pretty sure you
> are the right person to coordinate. :)
>
>
> https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/4
>
> Thanks,
> Dan

seeAlso:

1. 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/id/entity/https/github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues 
-- Linked Data URI that denotes (names) TAG issues collection

2. 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flinkeddata.uriburner.com%2Fabout%2Fid%2Fentity%2Fhttps%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3ctag%2Fspec-reviews%2Fissues 
-- alternative view oriented towards faceted exploration of relations

3. http://bit.ly/XCZrf4  -- Overview by Issue Creator via W3C issues 
tracking system.


Kingsley
>
>
> On 10/07/2013 08:38, "Appelquist Daniel (UK)"
> <Daniel.Appelquist@telefonica.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2013 04:07, "Noah Mendelsohn" <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A new draft of HTTP 2.0 is available at [1]. Since this is a significant
>>> change to one of the three "pillars" or Web architecture, it seems to me
>>> that the TAG should at least study this in detail.
>>>
>>> Noah
>>>
>>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-04
>>>
>> Thanks for posting this, Noah! I also note some raucous discussion on this
>> going on here:
>>
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/07/09/1455200/http-20-will-be-a-binary-p
>> r
>> otocol
>>
>> And an interesting post here by Poul-Hennings Kamp (@bsdphk):
>>
>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/phk/http20.html
>>
>> @Yves - as you've been closest to this work do you think you could post
>> your thoughts?  What are the key differences between HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 2.0
>> that we ought to be focusing on from a Web Architecture perspective.  I
>> will note that the TAG held a session on SPDY in 2011 with Mike Belshe:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/11/04-minutes.html#item01
>>
>> It's somewhat instructive reading those minutes, particularly about how
>> wide-spready deployment of SPDY might change the way Web Applications are
>> architected deployed.  To what extent has the SPDY work made it into HTTP
>> 2.0?
>>
>> Is there meaningful review we could do of the HTTP 2.0 work in the context
>> of AWWW 2.0, capability URLs, or the JavaScript-related work?  What
>> assumptions about the use of HTTP are we making in any of this work that
>> could potentially be impacted by HTTP 2.0?
>>
>> Dan
>>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen