W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2013

Re: FYI, tag election links

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:29:04 -0800
Message-ID: <50E31CE0.5010607@oracle.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
There seems to be overwhelming demand to extend AWWW.
These are good points that need to be addressed.  Thanks!
All the best, Ashok

On 1/1/2013 9:18 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
> On 31 December 2012 02:56, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com <mailto:masinter@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've posted some blog entries on the TAG election and my own personal perspectives and priorities:
>
>     http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/reinventing-w3c-tag.html
>
>     http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/governance-and-web-standards.html
>     http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/web-standards-and-security.html
>     http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/w3c-and-ietf-coordination.html
>
>
>
> I agree that there could be more liaison with the IETF.  The impression I have is that many involved with the IETF process are unfamiliar with the "Web" stack.  Many do not understand the capabilities of sparql, which essentially could have been a candidate to solve the webfinger use case.  Many coming to the web from the 2.0 era are unaware of the practicalities of splitting an HTTP document into sections using the # character, and that you can tie key / value pairs data points to those sections, creating a web of data.  From my experience I have found these points very difficult to explain to people that have pre conceived notions on how they think the web is architected.  I do point people to AWWW but my impression is that most do not have the patience to go through it and understand it.  I'd be grateful if there were some pointers to easily accessible educational material, either existing or ongoing.
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:29:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:51 UTC